Hi,
I noticed an interesting behaviour. When the autoCommit is turned off, I am not able to use the same connection handle to create multiple Statement/PreparedStatement handles.It goes into Manual Transaction Mode and says cannot clone connections.
Is this a bug? Can someone give some pointers here.
thanks
Shreyas
************************************************** ********************
Sent via Fuzzy Software @. http://www.fuzzysoftware.com/
Comprehensive, categorised, searchable collection of links to ASP & ASP.NET resources...
You need to add a property to the code that's making your connection:
selectMethod=cursor
Joe Weinstein at BEA
shreyask@.gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
> I noticed an interesting behaviour. When the autoCommit is turned off, I am not able to use the same connection handle to create multiple Statement/PreparedStatement handles.It goes into Manual Transaction Mode and says cannot clone connections.
> Is this a bug? Can someone give some pointers here.
> thanks
> Shreyas
> ************************************************** ********************
> Sent via Fuzzy Software @. http://www.fuzzysoftware.com/
> Comprehensive, categorised, searchable collection of links to ASP & ASP.NET resources...
|||You need to add a property to the code that's making your connection:
selectMethod=cursor
Joe Weinstein at BEA
shreyask@.gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
> I noticed an interesting behaviour. When the autoCommit is turned off, I am not able to use the same connection handle to create multiple Statement/PreparedStatement handles.It goes into Manual Transaction Mode and says cannot clone connections.
> Is this a bug? Can someone give some pointers here.
> thanks
> Shreyas
> ************************************************** ********************
> Sent via Fuzzy Software @. http://www.fuzzysoftware.com/
> Comprehensive, categorised, searchable collection of links to ASP & ASP.NET resources...
|||Shreyas Kaushik (shreyask@.gmail.com) wrote in message news:<eMtbpzUxEHA.2564@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl>...
> Hi,
> I noticed an interesting behaviour. When the autoCommit is turned off, I am not able to use the same connection handle to create multiple Statement/PreparedStatement handles.It goes into Manual Transaction Mode and says cannot clone connections.
> Is this a bug? Can someone give some pointers here.
> thanks
> Shreyas
> ************************************************** ********************
> Sent via Fuzzy Software @. http://www.fuzzysoftware.com/
> Comprehensive, categorised, searchable collection of links to ASP & ASP.NET resources...
This is one of the number of unfortunate consequences of the fact that
the driver silently creates >1 connection to the database when you
create > 1 statement. This is an example of what I was referring to in
my post in this group on 10/27 comparing the free MS driver to
comercial drivers.
So, well, yes its free but you have to deal with issues like this
one.. I guess you get what you pay for..
Showing posts with label behaviour. Show all posts
Showing posts with label behaviour. Show all posts
Friday, March 23, 2012
Problem with SP3 JDBC Driver for SQL Server
Problem with sp2... bug?
After I've installed the sql server 2005 sp2, some reports have a strange
behaviour. For example
In some case the Inscope function in a matrix, in the subtotal column,
returns different result (between sp1 and sp2)
And if I calcuted sum(field!FieldName,"row_matrix") in the subtotal column
(using the inscope function) , in some case it do the sum of the column.
I think that the two stange behaviour are correlateOn Apr 20, 10:45 am, "abc_abc" <e...@.phones.it> wrote:
> After I've installed the sql server 2005 sp2, some reports have a strange
> behaviour. For example
> In some case theInscope function in a matrix, in the subtotal column,
> returns different result (between sp1 and sp2)
> And if I calcuted sum(field!FieldName,"row_matrix") in the subtotal column
> (using theinscopefunction) , in some case it do the sum of the column.
> I think that the two stange behaviour are correlate
We just ran across this today too. The Inscope function evaluates
differently depending on where its being evaluated.|||Allen M ha scritto:
> On Apr 20, 10:45 am, "abc_abc" <e...@.phones.it> wrote:
> > After I've installed the sql server 2005 sp2, some reports have a strange
> > behaviour. For example
> >
> > In some case theInscope function in a matrix, in the subtotal column,
> > returns different result (between sp1 and sp2)
> > And if I calcuted sum(field!FieldName,"row_matrix") in the subtotal column
> > (using theinscopefunction) , in some case it do the sum of the column.
> > I think that the two stange behaviour are correlate
> We just ran across this today too. The Inscope function evaluates
> differently depending on where its being evaluated.
I also have the same problem.
is it a bug of SP2 ?
Alessio|||On May 17, 1:26 am, mxl...@.tiscali.it wrote:
> Allen M ha scritto:
> > On Apr 20, 10:45 am, "abc_abc" <e...@.phones.it> wrote:
> > > After I've installed the sql server 2005 sp2, some reports have a strange
> > > behaviour. For example
> > > In some case theInscope function in a matrix, in the subtotal column,
> > > returns different result (between sp1 and sp2)
> > > And if I calcuted sum(field!FieldName,"row_matrix") in the subtotal column
> > > (using theinscopefunction) , in some case it do the sum of the column.
> > > I think that the two stange behaviour are correlate
> > We just ran across this today too. TheInscopefunction evaluates
> > differently depending on where its being evaluated.
> I also have the same problem.
> is it abugof SP2 ?
> Alessio
Have either of you found anything on this?sql
behaviour. For example
In some case the Inscope function in a matrix, in the subtotal column,
returns different result (between sp1 and sp2)
And if I calcuted sum(field!FieldName,"row_matrix") in the subtotal column
(using the inscope function) , in some case it do the sum of the column.
I think that the two stange behaviour are correlateOn Apr 20, 10:45 am, "abc_abc" <e...@.phones.it> wrote:
> After I've installed the sql server 2005 sp2, some reports have a strange
> behaviour. For example
> In some case theInscope function in a matrix, in the subtotal column,
> returns different result (between sp1 and sp2)
> And if I calcuted sum(field!FieldName,"row_matrix") in the subtotal column
> (using theinscopefunction) , in some case it do the sum of the column.
> I think that the two stange behaviour are correlate
We just ran across this today too. The Inscope function evaluates
differently depending on where its being evaluated.|||Allen M ha scritto:
> On Apr 20, 10:45 am, "abc_abc" <e...@.phones.it> wrote:
> > After I've installed the sql server 2005 sp2, some reports have a strange
> > behaviour. For example
> >
> > In some case theInscope function in a matrix, in the subtotal column,
> > returns different result (between sp1 and sp2)
> > And if I calcuted sum(field!FieldName,"row_matrix") in the subtotal column
> > (using theinscopefunction) , in some case it do the sum of the column.
> > I think that the two stange behaviour are correlate
> We just ran across this today too. The Inscope function evaluates
> differently depending on where its being evaluated.
I also have the same problem.
is it a bug of SP2 ?
Alessio|||On May 17, 1:26 am, mxl...@.tiscali.it wrote:
> Allen M ha scritto:
> > On Apr 20, 10:45 am, "abc_abc" <e...@.phones.it> wrote:
> > > After I've installed the sql server 2005 sp2, some reports have a strange
> > > behaviour. For example
> > > In some case theInscope function in a matrix, in the subtotal column,
> > > returns different result (between sp1 and sp2)
> > > And if I calcuted sum(field!FieldName,"row_matrix") in the subtotal column
> > > (using theinscopefunction) , in some case it do the sum of the column.
> > > I think that the two stange behaviour are correlate
> > We just ran across this today too. TheInscopefunction evaluates
> > differently depending on where its being evaluated.
> I also have the same problem.
> is it abugof SP2 ?
> Alessio
Have either of you found anything on this?sql
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)